New link in the top of page "IRC Chat". |
Register | Login | |||||
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Last Posts
| IRC Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | XPW | Stats | Color Chart | Photo album |
| |
0 users currently in General Chat. |
User | Post |
Ryan Posts: 1499/1748 |
I'm mostly pro choice, but I do want women who are thinking of abortions to know what they are doing. I have seen videos of abortions being carried out, and they're not the nicest thing.
So I'm for this idea, unless there is a good reason for the abortion to be carried out like life threatening situations or rape. |
Lord Vulkas Mormonus Posts: 2967/4541 |
I disapprove of abortion anyway, unless in cases where the mother will die, or maybe rape.
So honestly, I think that I approve, showing them the ultrasound is a good idea, if they still think that having a child would be bad at that point, I don't really think they should go ahead, but whatever. The parents could just give the child to an adoption agency or something, I know of plenty of people who have done that, no reason to punish a child who hasn't even developed its eyes for your mistake. |
Rogue Posts: 4266/11918 |
I have the TV on simply as background noise, but it happens to be on the 700 Club. They started discussing how states should guilt more women into deciding against abortion.
South Carolina and many other states have started asking women if they would like to see an ultrasound prior to their abortion. Trick is, no abortion will be carried out for an hour after the ultrasound has been seen. http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hafzj8dc_EDqgSwNYuws_OM_HDKAD903T94O5 Though the article that link leads to mentions that it's optional to see an ultrasound, the 700 Club/CBN claimed that it can be interpreted as women will be required to receive an ultrasound, therefore forced to wait an hour. Thoughts? |