New link in the top of page "IRC Chat". |
Register | Login | |||||
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Last Posts
| IRC Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | XPW | Stats | Color Chart | Photo album |
| |
0 users currently in Debate Shrine. |
User | Post |
Rogue Posts: 4668/11918 |
First I would like to point out that journalists are meant to be objective when it comes to reporting events and not interfere with criminal investigations. They are allowed to find evidence themselves and point it out to police; however, they are usually not meant to act as federal agents in any regard. They're watchdogs, but not attack hounds. If they're assigned to cover starving people in Africa, they are obliged to not give out food or money no matter how badly they might want to help the people they're surrounded by. It's that important to maintain journalistic objectivity. Also, as a journalist, one is supposed to uphold the rights and liberties of the Constitution to the best of their ability. Now here's a question. As Fox's news/journalistic slant tends to be pro-Republican, would Bill O'Reilly be as adamant about finding the hackers and punishing them so intently were it Obama and Biden's e-mail accounts hacked. OR would he be the first one to publish what scandalous e-mails were posted from the hackings? P.S. Some reports have actually posted screenshots of 4Chan (yeah, seriously) where someone said "Start looking for Pelosi's." |