 New link in the top of page "IRC Chat". |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Last Posts
| IRC Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | XPW | Stats | Color Chart | Photo album |
|
| | ||
New link in the top of page "IRC Chat". |
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Last Posts
| IRC Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | XPW | Stats | Color Chart | Photo album |
|
| | ||
| Xeogaming Forums - - Posts by BBQMissile |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 |
| User | Post | ||
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath          Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| Aragorn is a top notch swordsman and archer, trained by elves. Through his experiences as "Strider", he is also stealthy when necessary. Aragorn is trained in combat and engaging in war. Though he wields a two handed sword, he is fast and nimble. Leatherface is just a psycho. While his chainsaw is sure to be a formidable weapon, i doubt he can wield it as well as Aragorn can wield his weapon. Therefore, Aragorn should emerge victorious. | |||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| Bond was fighting against other men. Not a vampire.
Bond's conventional weapons simply aren't enough to fight something supernatural. Bond is skilled in killing men, not vampires. Well i have no doubt that Lestat will find Bond to be a formidable foe, in the end Lestat will emerge victorious. Conventional human weapons do not stand a chance against the supernatural. |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| First of all, where are you getting the whole "there are two types of zombies, science and mystical" info from? And yes, you make a point with zombie. But interestingly enough, Lestat is not a zombie but in fact a vampire, which is not the same thing.
Also, Lestat had his throat sliced, his body drowned, mangled and chewed up by animals, etc. etc. Taking this into account, I have no reason to doubt that he'll survive lasers. I doubt that Lestat will just stand in place to let Bond attack him with the laser though. You are welcome to think that vampires are still men. I would say you are wrong, but that's only as far as i'm concerned. However, let's look at it from your point of view. Sure, let's pretend vampires are still men. But if you do think that, you must also take into consideration that these 'men' do not die when stabbed, shot, sliced, etc. These 'men' are much stronger than their normal counterparts. What would easily send a regular man to Hades, would barely make these "men" flinch. And also, there's a flaw in your Buffy theory. Buffy is a Slayer. She has supernatural powers to fight the forces of evil. Yes, she can kick a human's ass, but the main purpose of her powers is to fight the darkness, including vampires. Her purpose is to slay vampires. Your sentence should have been phrased as such: "Buffy the Vampire slayer is skilled in killing vampires, but she often kicks human ass anyway". Bond's purpose is not to slay vampires. This is why Bond is different. And this is why Lestat would win. |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| The interviews are just wasting space. I honestly don't know why anyone would even want to read all these interviews anyway. They seem pretty pointless. | |||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| Jin from Samurai Champloo.
You look me straight in the eyes and tell me that he didn't look awesome in the last episode during the final fight scenes. |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| Seticus, there's no reason to act like a condescending whining asshole just because no one agrees with you.
And also, throughout you're entire rant there, complete with mocking phrases, you contradicted yourself and your previous posts. Originally posted by Seticus The whole point of the tournament is to see who's better. Just because one character prevails over another doesn't mean that the victorious character is a "God Tier" character. Originally posted by Seticus Strange. I could've sworn it was you who said that the vampires are still men. Originally posted by Seticus Ok. But it still doesn't make him a vampire slayer...which Buffy is. Originally posted by Seticus First of all, the cap locks was completely unnecessary. And secondly, this is a complete and utter lie. Stop twisting everyone's words to suit your argument. We already assume James Bond has the gadgets and gizmos he uses in the movies just like we assume Lestat is already a vampire. To say that we never gave James anything to start with is a statement of pure ignorance. Originally posted by Seticus Right now, you're literally pulling words out of your own ass. Not once did i ever state that supernaturals cannot die. And no, i did not make Lestat impervious to any damage. It's simply within the context of this battle and this battle alone that leads me to believe that Bond doesn't stand a chance. Bond simply isn't capable of killing Lestat. This doesn't hold true for the other competitiors in this tournament. And according to your theory dogs are men. Cats are men. Rats are men. Why? Cause they can all die. Originally posted by Seticus First of all, stop whining just because your point keeps getting shot down. Secondly, Cairoi is kind enough to spend his time to even make this tournament. You should be a bit more appreciative. And finally, Cairoi is only a man. Therefore, he makes mistakes. Edit: Seticus stop twisting everyone's words and saying that people said this and that when they never did. finally, stop pulling arguments out of your ass. If you're going to say that Rogue said this or Sparda said this, prove it. And finally, stop making such a big deal out of this. it's for fun...but you're just blowing it out of proportions because no one agrees with you. By going on and on with your ridiculous rants, people don't see you as some kind of rebel or some proud person. people just see you as an ignorant asshole. (Last edited by BBQMissile on 03-29-07 04:24 AM) |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| when i get a video of my guitar playing recorded and uploaded, i'll post it here.
oh and Shuyin about fucking time |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| Your ignorance overwhelms me. And i am overwhelmed by my own foolishness; foolishness in thinking that i could even begin to reason with an ignorant, uncaring hypocrite such as yourself. Therefore, i extend my apologies to Cairoi for having even tried to present my case to Seticus in hopes that perhaps he might be more open to other viewpoints, but still keep his own and for pursuing the argument even further when Seticus decided to be a stubborn and unreasonable hardass.
This will be my last post in this thread. and in an attempt to stay on topic... no. forget it. i can't even do that anymore. but here's to lestat winning. |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| I've never played RO so i really can't say which game is better. All i can say is that i do enjoy this game a lot. Every so often, when i have a bit of spare time, I'll open it up and complete a quest or two.
A pretty cool feature, at least for my character is to be able to use dual swords. It looks awesome and you basically deal 2 times the damage as you normally do with a single sword. The ability to summon pets is also a nice feature. (Last edited by BBQMissile on 03-31-07 02:07 PM) |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| Colony of Birchmen- Mastodon | |||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| THe Old Testament was not written by Moses. They were written by several people, though we are unsure of their names. We simply identify them into specific groups such as the Priestly Writers.
And also, "Thou Shalt Not Take the Lord's Name in Vain" does not only refer to "Yahweh" but all his names. The idea is respect to the Creator. God can have many names and one true name. If you take one of his other names in vain, you're still showing disrespect to him and its just as serious as taking his real name in vain. The Old Testament is simply a collection of stories that were written, not only to preserve the culture of the Jewish people for future generations, but also to explain certain subject matters that have been questioned for centuries. Therefore, some stories are true, some stories are partially true, some stories are simply creations of the imagination. Therefore, it is unwise to say "God killed this many people cause it says so in the Old Testament!". No. It's only in the Old Testament to prove a point. It may have happened but then again, it may not have happened (chances are, it didn't happen). Many things in the Old Testament are exaggerated just so that a point is proven. Therefore, i don't believe saying "God killed this many people but Satan killed none" is a good statement to make. And also, Caroi, i don't understand the point you're trying to make. The New and Old Testament are already two different things. (Last edited by BBQMissile on 04-05-07 09:17 PM) |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Truth/Serum Bring it on. |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
And you would be right Cairoi. The Old Testament is more "Jewish" and the New Testament is more "Christian" if they can even be categorized as such. That is why the Old Testament, or the Torah, is what Jewish scriptures consist of while the Christian Bible includes the Old and New Testaments.
Originally posted by Cairoi Once again, you have to take into consideration that most of the things in the Old Testament were written simply to get a point across. And also, most of the things written in the Old Testament reflect the times. If taken into a more contemporary context, most of the things written in the Old Testament would be considered unwise and unnatural to carry out. Those who, as you said, tell about God's kindness and how homosexuality is wrong because it's in the Old Testament, are no different from the Pharisees in the New Testament. They are hypocrites and obey only the letter of the Law. They forget one of the most important things that Jesus taught his followers: To obey the spirit of the law. Originally posted by Cairoi This goes back to what i was saying earlier. Back then, during the times of the Old Testament, it would have been necessary to kill the unbelievers in the name of God for it was "kill or be killed". Such were the ways of people back then. But also as i said before, carrying out things that were done in the Old Testament, in modern times, would be unwise. The Bible has not changed. However, time has. Therefore, it is necessary not to be a slave of Scriptures and follow its every word. Rather, understand the message that it is trying to get across and follow that instead. And yeah, it's stupid to die for a bunch of stories. Dying for your faith is another thing though. |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| imo, the picture of those girls you posted look pretty disgusting to me.
and to answer your question. it's simply because society is very picky. Many people are afraid to be themselves because they fear what the rest of the world may think about them. Therefore, they feel the need to look the way society dictates so that they are 'safe' from insults. They try to gain a good self-image so that the world can accept them, though ironically, the only reason they do this is because of their already poor self-image. Really, it's all about 'society'. But then again, society is a very vague term to use and it'd be unfair to simply throw that term around without understanding what kind of society. Advertisements. Commercials. Reality Shows. Movies. Toys. Video Games. Music Videos. These things affect people which in turn leads to pressure. This pressure leads people to believe that they have act or look a certain way in order to be accepted...and it's not hard to understand why. When a girl sees that every single woman in music videos nowadays dresses like a slut, she may end up thinking that that's the only way to go. Everytime one of the societal factors that i mentioned before shows perfection, some will believe that it is necessary to achieve this 'perfection', if that's what you can really call it. |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| Banana
Translation: I'm in |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| you guys should probably just close this thread seeing as how this is now nothing more than back and forth between Odin and Nagis. It just seems like it might make more sense to do this through PMs.
So...uh... Mastodon. Awesome band. I just got into them after listening to Colony of Birchmen. Some intense stuff. (Last edited by BBQMissile on 04-10-07 06:00 PM) |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| Samurai 7
really it's a masterpiece. Based off of of the original Seven Samurai, a small village in Japan hires seven samurai to protect them from a group of bandits. However, upon defeating the bandits, the samurai realize that theres a conspiracy against all the villages that runs deep into the capital. i just finished watching the 26 episode anime and i was amazed. If you're into samurai, swords, and robots, then this is for you. The ending's very sad though. |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Týr I second that. especially in the last episode where they go all out and end up fist fighting each other. It was amazing. Also, the scene in Samurai 7 where Kikuchiyo picks up the massive bandit sword and holds it up to stop the capital ship. Absolutely amazing. The aftermath also adds to the powerful emotions of the scene. |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| The ending is unchanged from the original Seven Samurai. Therefore, if you know what happens in Seven Samurai, expect to be unsurprised in Samurai 7.
Personally, I felt it was a very appropriate ending for the overall tone of the series. It's not a happy one, but I was satisfied. |
|||
|
BBQMissile ChaoticDeath Since: 08-16-04 From: New York Since last post: 4732 days Last activity: 720 days |
| ||
| Read the title.
Discuss. |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 |
| Xeogaming Forums - - Posts by BBQMissile |
